Rotate View Port

Diese Seiten wurden speziell für die Benutzer unserer Software installiert, um sich untereinander und mit uns, Informationen, Neuigkeiten, Bilder und Dateien auszutauschen. Egal ob Dietrich's Abbundprogramm oder DC-Statik, hier sind alle Holzbau Profis richtig. Natürlich auch die ohne Holzbausoftware ;)


Wenn Sie selbst aktiv werden wollen, melden Sie sich unverbindlich mit einem Benutzernamen und einem Passwort an. Klicken Sie hierzu auf der linken Seite den Punkt "Benutzerkonto erstellen" an.


Wir wünschen unseren Besuchern einen informativen und angenehmen Aufenthalt bei Dietrich's FIX


Ihr Team Dietrich's Online - Holzbau ist unser Programm

  • Kayaker,


    No, there is no option to rotate the view port itself. You can easily rotate the whole model with 3-01.

    Jason Kilmartin
    Dietrich's N.A

  • You can change the size of the view port, but I don't know if that helps you?

    Sincerely Yours. M. Sc. E. Thorvald, Denmark
    (Dietrichs version 7.03).

  • Thanks Thorvald,


    I think I know why you suggested rotating the view port thinking I need to make room on my drawing. I will try Jason’s approach, I need to rotate the plan view drawing and then project lines from it as I prepare for a 2D front elevation if that makes any sense. I'm just waiting for someone to ball me out for not using D-cam and having elevations automatically generated. But I need to make design decisions first thinking this will save time in the modeling phase using D-cam. I hope.


    Thanks!


    Kayaker

  • He he, Kayaker - then somebody should hit me too, for not using D-cam sections first! ;)


    I also sometimes make 2D drawings first to decide how to make things, before I make them in 3D - because sometimes I am around 5+ different solutions before I hit the solution that satisfies my boss - and to make all these changes in 3D and then remake the 2D section drawings, will take longer time than to do it all in 2D. Another reason is that you may not want to make all layers and parts in 3D - and then you still have to draw these parts in 2D, to get a complete picture of the section drawing.

    Sincerely Yours. M. Sc. E. Thorvald, Denmark
    (Dietrichs version 7.03).

  • Hi Thorvald,


    I'm glad to hear an experienced user like you uses the D-cad 2d approach early in the preliminary and design development phase. For a minute I was having second thoughts about this approach, because it is still a lot of mouse work for me. I'm wondering if any of the top ten extreme POWER users do the same.


    Thanks for the reply!


    Kayaker

  • Yeah, I think it is sometimes easier to use the 2D approach to design a solution. But of course you will often not be able to count for every detail, how it will work in 3D. T.ex. if you make a cross section in two directions of a structure, that is a bit complicated - then it can be difficult to predict, how these two sections will act in the corner. But these detailed details, you will design in 3D, because it is often too difficult in 2D. Yes the 2D approach requires some work, but I think it is worth the effort. Because somehow one often "think" better in 2D.

    Sincerely Yours. M. Sc. E. Thorvald, Denmark
    (Dietrichs version 7.03).

Jetzt mitmachen!

Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!